Tuesday, October 31, 2017

rent apartment section 8 downtown chicago


judy woodruff: good evening. i'm judy woodruff. on the "newshour" tonight: tragedy in berlin. at least nine people are dead and many othersinjured after a truck plowed into a christmas market. also ahead: escaping a nightmare. after days of delays, evacuations resume inthe war ravaged syrian city of aleppo. then: protests greet electoral college votersas they gather at statehouses across the country to finalize president-elect trump's win.

our politics monday duo analyze the latestin the transition. plus: a rare look inside bruce springsteen'spersonal studio. the rock legend opens up about his creativeprocess. bruce springsteen, musician: most artistsi know consider themselves to be phonies, along with the feeling that there's somethingthat you're doing is essential, essential to communicate, and deeply, deeply real. judy woodruff: all that and more on tonight's"pbs newshour." (break) judy woodruff: it's been a day of horror inthe capital cities of germany and turkey.

first berlin, where a truck drove into a crowdof christmas shoppers, leaving the street full of dead and wounded. we get more now from ira spitzer. he's the berlin bureau chief for feature storynews. and a warning: some images might be disturbingto some viewers. let me start, ira spitzer, with this commentwe just saw crossing the wires. and that is the german interior minister sayingthat more information now does seem to point to an act of terrorism. what do you know?

ira spitzer, feature story news: well, theberlin police have confirmed that nine people have been killed in the scene of violenceearlier in berlin, and one of those -- one of the dead was a passenger in that truck. in addition to the nine people who died, atleast 50 others are injured, some seriously. so, the -- as you mentioned there, the germaninterior minister saying that there are signs here that point to a terror attack. no one has come out and explicitly said thatthis was intentional, but we also heard from -- the white house issued a statement notlong ago, and they also referenced that this was possibly a terror attack.

so, investigations are ongoing here in berlin,trying to uncover what happened, but an important piece of information here, the driver, thesuspected driver of the truck has been taken into custody. so much, of course, will hinge on who thatperson is and what they are able to uncover from him. but, at the moment, police have asked peopleto stay off the streets in berlin. there is an ongoing rescue operation that'shappened at a christmas market right near the heart of berlin, so a tragic situationunfolding right now. judy woodruff: ira spitzer, tell us a littlebit more about where this happened.

you describe it as a christmas market. what exactly was the location, the situation? ira spitzer: so, this happened in the districtof charlottenburg, right near the gedachtniskirche, which is a famous landmark here in berlin. it is a church where they have not repairedthe steeple from world war ii, so it's visited by many tourists throughout the course ofthe year, and this christmas market is someplace where thousands of people congregate in themonth leading up to the holidays here. people go there with their families. they eat, drink, do christmas shopping.

so, christmas markets are a very big traditionin germany, a much loved tradition in germany. and there also has been a lot of speculationin the past few months that perhaps a christmas market could be the target of a terror attack. so they have stepped up security across theboard. however, at these open spaces like this, itis, of course, very difficult to predict and then to prevent an attack from taking place. now, again, we don't know a hundred percentthat this was an intentional act. however, the authorities are certainly treatingit as such right now. judy woodruff: ira spitzer watching this unfoldingstory in berlin for us, thank you very much.

and, meantime, hours before that berlin incident,the russian ambassador to turkey was assassinated by a lone gunman in ankara. andrey karlov was addressing an art exhibitionwhen a turkish policeman in civilian clothes opened fire. he shouted slogans about syria, where russia'smilitary is heavily involved. the gunman later died in a shoot-out withpolice. russian president vladimir putin and turkey'spresident recep tayyip erdogan condemned the attack. in the day's other news: here in the unitedstates, the electoral college confirmed that

donald trump's victory in the presidentialrace. he was on track for 304 electoral votes, losingtwo defectors in texas. hillary clinton lost four electors in washingtonstate. otherwise, it went mostly as expected, despitea day of demonstrations. john yang reports. john yang: election day, part two. in some states, protesters urged electoralcollege voters to dump president-elect trump. in pennsylvania: woman: i'm here today because i feel likeit's the last chance we have to really save

this country. i mean, hillary clinton won the popular vote. i'm hoping we can make some kind of differencein the electoral college. john yang: the outcome didn't change, butcontroversy still swirls around evidence of russian cyber-attacks aimed at influencingthe election. sen. john mccain (r), arizona: there's no doubtthey were interfering and no doubt that it was cyber-attacks. the question now is, how much and what damageand what should the united states of america

do? john yang: senator john mccain and fellowrepublican lindsey graham have now joined with democrats chuck schumer and jack reedto call for a special senate committee to try to find the answers. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell saysexisting panels should handle the investigation. clinton campaign chairman john podesta suggestedtrump aides may have colluded with moscow. john podesta, former clinton campaign chairman:what did trump, inc., know and when did they know it? were they in touch with the russians?

i think those are still open questions. john yang: mr. trump's incoming chief of staffsaid the president-elect isn't convinced russia was behind the hacking. reince priebus, incoming white house chiefof staff: i think he would accept the conclusion if these intelligence professionals wouldget together, put out a report, show the american people that they're actually on the same page,as opposed to third parties through the washington post. john yang: mr. trump is spending the christmasholidays at his mar-a-lago resort in florida. for the "pbs newshour," i'm john yang.

judy woodruff: also today, the trump transitionteam announced that he's naming businessman and veteran vincent viola as secretary ofthe army. state legislators in north carolina appearready to repeal a law that curbs protections for transgender people. the democratic governor-elect, roy cooper,announced it today. republicans who supported the law said thatthey're now open to repeal in a special session on wednesday. the law has cost the state major sports events,concerts and corporate expansions. the head of the international monetary fund,christine lagarde, was convicted today of

financial negligence. a special french court found that she shouldhave blocked a huge arbitration award to a business tycoon in 2008. lagarde was french finance minister at thetime. despite the guilty verdict, the court optedagainst any punishment. that left lagarde's lawyers questioning thepoint of the proceedings. christopher baker, attorney for christinelagarde: the result of this last five years is nothing, which leaves us in kind of a complicatedor strange, again, situation. we have an unusual court, with an unusualhearing, with no accusation and no sentence.

so, where are we exactly? judy woodruff: late today, the imf's executiveboard decided to retain lagarde as the managing director of the organization. in south korea, the extortion trial of choisoon-sil opened today. she's the longtime confidante of the now-impeachedpresident park geun-hye. choi appeared in court in seoul wearing whiteprison clothes. she denied using her ties with park to makebig companies give millions to foundations she controlled. park has received extensive immunity fromprosecution.

she, too, denies wrongdoing. cities in the north of china were engulfedin a choking haze of air today, and the government issued a red alert for a third straight day. hundreds of factories and schools were closedand restrictions on driving were in place. many in beijing wore face masks to try tokeep the smog out of their lungs. woman (through translator): i think it's veryinconvenient for going out. i really don't like putting on the face mask. i can't go to the supermarket or take my childto play outside. we spent the last two days at home over thisweekend.

judy woodruff: china's severe air pollutionis blamed on its heavy reliance on coal and carbon emissions from older cars. back in this country, the u.s. interior departmentset final rules to limit damage from coal mining. they'd protect some 6,000 miles of streamsby barring mining within 100 feet of the water. industry officials, though, warn that theregulations will kill jobs, and the incoming republican congress could well vote to blockthem. the city of new orleans today announced settlementsin fatal shootings by police after hurricane katrina.

two people were shot dead on the danzigerbridge, and a third at a strip mall. the settlements in those killings, and onebefore the hurricane, total more than $13 million. mitch landrieu (d), mayor of new orleans,louisiana: the city is here today to try to the extent that is humanly possible to bringclosure to this dark, dark, dark time and to pledge that it shall never happen again,because, as i have said, change is going to come. judy woodruff: the settlements are with 17plaintiffs who sued over the killings. in addition, 20 current or former new orleanspolice officers were charged in federal civil

rights investigations after katrina. a number of them were convicted or pleadedguilty to criminal charges. president obama today pardoned 79 people convictedof crimes and shortened the sentences for 153 others. it's the most in a single day by any president. mr. obama has focused mainly on drug offenders. the white house says he has now pardoned orcommuted the sentences for more than 1,300 people, more than any of his predecessors. wall street managed modest gains today.

the dow jones industrial average was up 39points to close at 19883. the nasdaq rose 20, and the s&p 500 addedfour. and zsa zsa gabor died sunday in los angeles,after years of ill health. the hungarian-born actress was known for herglamorous image and multiple marriages, including to hotel mogul conrad hilton in the 1940s. and she made divorce an art form, once quipping:"i am a marvelous housekeeper. every time i leave a man, i keep his house." zsa zsa gabor was 99 years old. still to come on the "newshour": evacuationsresume in aleppo after delays and dangerous

conditions; protest greet electors castingtheir vote for the next president; our politics monday duo take on today's political importance;and much more. the united nations security council demandedthat the syrian government and other interested parties allow the u.n. to have unhinderedaccess to aleppo, so that monitors can watch those trying to flee that war-ravaged city. it was a welcome sight for thousands of syrianstrapped in eastern aleppo, waiting in the cold. evacuations resumed overnight, after daysof delays, under terms of a fragile cease-fire. man (through translator): we were very hungry.

god will take revenge on our behalf. hopefully, we will return to aleppo. judy woodruff: forty-seven children trappedin an orphanage were among those rescued, but the u.n. children's agency, unicef, reportedsome were in critical condition. the evacuees were being ferried to idlib province,widely expected to be the next front in the government's offensive. at the same time, buses evacuated civiliansfrom two shiite villages in idlib besieged by rebels. the syrian army and its allies demanded thatevacuation in exchange for letting thousands

of civilians and rebel fighters leave easternaleppo. many of the evacuees were taken first to therebel-held town of al-rashideen, west of aleppo. they received much-needed food, water andhumanitarian aid, and, by nightfall, they huddled around fires to stay warm, and recountedthe horror they left behind. mahmoud abu mohammad, evacuee (through translator):we left aleppo to escape the relentless shelling. all the houses were damaged. not a single one remained undamaged. we left because of the heavy airstrikes. judy woodruff: late in the day, turkish officialsestimated some 20,000 people had been bussed

out of eastern aleppo so far. for more on what comes next for aleppo's evacuatedcivilians and what u.n. monitors will be able to do, i'm joined by former british foreignsecretary david miliband. he's now ceo of the international rescue committee. david miliband, welcome. i think it's pretty self-evident, but whyare these monitors necessary? david miliband, former british foreign secretary:the simple reason for these monitors is that aleppo has not just been a site of terribledeath and destruction over the last few months. it's also been the site of the destructionof basic norms of international humanitarian

law, not just the besiegement or the randomizedbombings of civilian centers, including a hospital supported by the international rescuecommittee, but also door-to-door, cold-blooded murder by militias working their way throughthe city. and i think it's very important that thereare people on the ground who can, by bearing witness or threatening to bear witness towhat's happening, try to put a stop to it. everything that we're seeing and hearing frompeople who have fled the city is that the fear levels are at terrifying levels. judy woodruff: but can they put a stop toit by monitoring? david miliband: i think that the monitoringon its own is only part of the answer.

obviously, there's got to be a decision fromthe syrian government, and their russian backers, and the hezbollah militias that have beenworking their way through the city, about what they're going to do next. obviously, the russians voted for this resolutionin the security council today. some people were surprised by that. and if it does mean a halt to the terriblescenes that we have seen over the last week inside aleppo, that's obviously a step forward. the people that we're meeting 20 kilometersto the west of aleppo in the governorate of idlib are concerned that they're moving fromone killing zone into another, because obviously

the great fear is that the tactics that havebeen used in aleppo are now deployed in idlib, which is 1.9 million people across the wholegovernorate. the bombing, the murder, the great dangeris that that flows with the people to the west. judy woodruff: and i want to ask you aboutthat, but when it comes to aleppo, is it believed, is it understood that these monitors are goingto be in a position to stop whatever indiscriminate killing or other terrible things are happeningto these people as they leave? david miliband: well, at best, they can bearwitness to it. they're obviously not in a position to intervenemilitarily.

it's not a u.n. peacekeeping force that hasbeen deployed as a result of this resolution today. it's a group of monitors who are unarmed andwho are there to monitor the conduct of the security and other forces and report on it. now, it is right and better for there to besome degree of international presence, but, obviously, that is cold comfort to very, veryscared residents of aleppo who have been the subject of this brutal assault not just overthe last few weeks, but over the last few years. judy woodruff: well, to the point you weremaking a moment ago, david miliband, the place

where these evacuees are going, idlib province,as we reported, is expected to be the next front in the government's focus. why are they any safer there than they werein aleppo? david miliband: well, i think that the wordsof the people who are fleeing tell it all. they say, we had to get out of hell. and they don't know where -- whether the placethey're going to is going to be any better, but there is a chance that it might. idlib has a different composition, populationcomposition, and a different group of rebel fighters who are dominant there.

it's an area that combines a large governmentwith idlib city, which is a confined urban area like aleppo. it's going to be a much tougher military effort,i think, on the part of the syrian and the russian forces. and the great plea -- and i'm afraid it isonly a plea from the international community at the moment -- is that the tactics of bombardment,besiegement and then door-to-door murder are not deployed in idlib. and in the absence of international militarysupport, then it can only be a diplomatic plea that the way this war takes its nextturn is going to be critical for whether any

stability comes back to syria in the future. you reported yourselves that isis have beenresurgent in taking palmyra. judy woodruff: right. david miliband: and we know from history thatthe way wars are concluded is absolutely the key to whether or not there is any peace tobe kept. judy woodruff: so, i guess my question is,is there an expectation that what these monitors are doing in aleppo could -- they could justbe moved next to idlib to prevent the same kind of thing from happening there and thenonto the next place where the government is moving in?

david miliband: well, the terrible truth ofthe last few weeks is that there has been plenty on social media and elsewhere explainingwhat's been going on in aleppo, but it's not been possible to rally any kind of sufficientdiplomatic, political or other pressure on those taking part in these activities to preventthe kind of horrific scenes that you broadcast last week and that are feared in the future. this is now a real test of whether or notthe russians and their iranian backers are serious about winning a sustainable peacein syria, whether they are serious about taking on some of the rebel elements who are affiliatedwith al-qaida, or whether this is simply a pretense and a fig leaf for a wider attemptto drive large sections of the syrian population

out of their homes as part of a bloody attemptto restore order. judy woodruff: finally, do you believe theyare serious, based on what you know? david miliband: well, i have had -- over thelast five years of this conflict, the international rescue committee has had between 1,200 and2,500 local staff on the ground through this. and it has been the most appalling descentinto hell for all of the people who work for us. all of the norms under which internationalhumanitarian organizations work have been violated. never did i think we would see the day ofu.n. convoys being bombed.

and never did i think we would go back tothe days when there seemed to be no accountability for the most grotesque abuses of human rights. so, i cannot -- of even human life, nevermind human rights. so, for me to sit here comfortably and tellyou i'm confident about the future would be quite wrong. this is a desperate situation in syria. i have got my own staff in the front line. and we're desperate for the kind of coordinatedand impactful political and diplomatic pressure that can ease some of the plight of the civiliansand allow us to get on with our work.

judy woodruff: david miliband, the ceo ofthe international rescue committee, we thank you. david miliband: thank you very much. judy woodruff: back in this country, president-electdonald trump is now one step closer to officially sealing his victory. but the debate over the value of the electoralcollege has intensified this year, in part because hillary clinton won the popular voteby almost three million votes. william brangham has our report. william brangham: at the maryland statehousein annapolis today, a rare sight for our cameras:

members of the electoral college gatheringto cast their official votes for president and vice president. woman: i vote today for hillary rodham clinton. william brangham: after a simple roll callvote, maryland's 10 electors have spoken and certified the official results for the state. hillary clinton swept maryland on electionday, and, as expected, she received all 10 electoral votes. in just 40 minutes, more than a year of presidentialcampaigning comes to an end. but it's not just here in maryland.

across the country today, electors from all50 states and the district of columbia gathered to do the same, from pennsylvania and virginiato colorado and michigan. even bill clinton is an elector in new york. now, in most years, no one pays much attentionto this process. the electoral college vote is something ofan afterthought. but this time, electors have been under alot of pressure. some even received hate mail and death threatsbecause some voters wanted them to change their votes, and deny donald trump the presidency. we all know the white house hinges on thatmagical 270 number.

that's the simple majority of 538 electoralvotes. it's a number mr. trump clearly reached onelection night. judy woodruff: the associated press is callingwisconsin, so that puts him over the top. donald trump is the next president of theunited states. william brangham: that's the theory, at least,because most states have laws that bind electors to cast their vote according to the popularvote in their state. if they don't, they can be replaced or punishedwith a fine. but some states do allow for what's calledfaithless electors, and they can vote for whomever they want, regardless of how theirstate voted on election day.

now, these faithless electors are pretty rare. there have only been about 160 in history,and they have never flipped the outcome of an election. to have upended trump's victory this year,it would have taken 37 electors to change their votes, and that didn't happen. there were a handful of would-be defectorsthis year, including ones in georgia and texas. they chose to resign as electors, rather thanvote for mr. trump. they were replaced today by trump supporters. but only one republican had come out publiclyas faithless elector, chris suprun from texas.

chris suprun, elector: i am not voting fordonald trump because i don't think he's the right man for the job. william brangham: and harvard law professorlawrence lessig, who briefly ran for president as a democrat this year, argues electors havea moral obligation to vote their conscience. lawrence lessig, harvard law school: our goalis to let the electors exercise their judgment. the electoral college was made for this election,precisely. william brangham: but trump's incoming chiefof staff, reince priebus, says these efforts are just sour grapes. reince priebus, incoming white house chiefof staff: it's about democrats that can't

accept the outcome of the election. it's about delegitimizing the american system. william brangham: as they have done in electionspast, the states will now send their vote totals to washington, d.c., where congresswill tally them in a joint session next month and officially announce the election results. dick cheney, former vice president of theunited states: barack obama of the state of illinois has received for president of theunited states 365 votes. (cheering and applause) william brangham: for the "pbs newshour,"i'm william brangham.

judy woodruff: and, as we reported earlier,one additional republican elector in texas voted against donald trump, bringing his numberof defectors to two. stay with us. coming up on the "newshour": building a memorialfor victims of a terrible legacy; and an intimate look at what makes bruce springsteen a rocklegend. but, first, it's time for politics mondaywith tamara keith of npr and amy walter of the cook political report. and welcome to both of you. a lot going on today.

tamara keith, national public radio: yes. judy woodruff: namely, as we just saw in thatreport, amy, that donald trump is over the top. the outcome is not surprising, but there werea lot of protests, a lot of noise made around state capitals around the country. is the electoral college process in any danger? amy walter, the cook political report: well,no, i don't think so. there were a lot of protests, but, at theend of the day, there were nor defectors on the democratic side than on the republicanside.

you had one in minnesota, one in maine whowanted to vote for bernie sanders. now, ultimately, the state law doesn't allowthat. they ended up both casting -- in one case,an alternate cast for hillary clinton. but there were four in washington state, astate that she carried, that voted for someone other than hillary clinton. so, i don't think that we're seeing a breakdownof the electoral college by any measure, but electors are using the focus on them to makea broader point on the democratic side much more than the republican side. one final note.

it's amazing how much winning brings peopletogether. and at the end of the day, the democrats werethe ones who lost. they had more of a stake in making a biggerstatement than republicans, who won, and they just simply want to move on and get the republicancongress and the republican president in office. judy woodruff: but, tam, this is a reminder,though, that this election, that a lot of people are not content just to let this electionsit, that they are going to go on a protest, even though they knew the odds were reallylong they were going to change anything. tamara keith: yes, this was one of the thingswhere people felt like they needed to try. so, people were contacting -- mostly peopleon the left were contacting electors trying

to do something. there were a handful of electors who wantedan intelligence briefing. ultimately -- about the alleged russian meddlingin the election. ultimately, that didn't happen. the person who won the electoral college onelection night won the electoral college tonight. and it will be finalized and made officialon january 6. judy woodruff: so, let's talk about the russianmeddling piece of this. amy, you now have senators commenting. donald trump, of course, his -- the peoplearound him has commented.

the intelligence community is united now insaying it does look as if not only did the russians hack the democrats, the democraticnational committee and john podesta, but they did it to help donald trump. what is the political fallout? where do we go from here... (crosstalk) amy walter: the political fallout becomesvery difficult, because it's hard to separate, at least in the minds of many in the politicalcommunity, the difference between russian meddling, which the intelligence communitiesagrees on, and russian meddling to help donald

trump, which then gets us right into the politicaland partisan debates. and whereas you have at least four senators,two democrats, two republicans, john mccain and lindsey graham on the republican side,and two democrats with them, saying we should have a special committee, you're not hearinga groundswell from the grassroots on the republican side and from republican leadership to supporta special committee. once you get into a special committee to enforceit, then it becomes partisan and political. and this entire debate about russian involvement,you can't -- you theoretically can separate it from the politics, but we really can't. judy woodruff: so, where does it go from here,tam?

tamara keith: well, the relevant committeeswill investigate, the intelligence committee certainly on the senate side. that's where mitch mcconnell, the senate majorityleader, has said he thinks this should be. obviously, john mccain and chuck schumer andsome others would like a select committee. but it's not clear that will happen. it truly is remarkable. if you took the names off of it, and you justsaid, russia meddles in the u.s. elections, people would be extremely alarmed, and itwouldn't break along partisan lines. but because it is, russia meddled, donaldtrump may have been aided, hillary clinton

may have been harmed, suddenly, it does becomesignificantly more political. but we should also say that no one is saying-- people like john mccain are saying that russia clearly did something, clearly didthis hacking. but john mccain, president obama, variousothers are saying that election systems were not hacked, votes were not hacked. however, those e-mails were. and they were leaked out at inopportune timesfor one candidate. judy woodruff: is there hangover, though,amy, in all this from what president obama did or didn't do?

he had a news conference on friday. he defended his own actions. is there any lingering -- we heard some pushbackfrom donna brazile, the acting democratic party chair, about what the president saidabout how he told vladimir putin cut it out. and she said, well, no, actually, they didn'tcut it out. they kept at it after he talked to putin. amy walter: that's right. to go right on tam's point, there was verylittle that the president could do that wouldn't have made this the partisan political issuethat it is today.

and it would have been even more highly chargedin the middle of a campaign. and, at the end of the day, i think the folksin the white house, as with many people here in washington, believed that hillary clintonwas going to win on election night and that this issue brought up post-election wouldbe less contentious than in the middle of a campaign. judy woodruff: i want to turn you both nowto what we are just learning about literally in the last few minutes. and that is donald trump put out a statementand has been tweeting, tam, about these incidents in europe, in turkey.

he is lumping together the assassination inturkey of the russian ambassador and the terrible incident in berlin with the truck drivinginto a crowd in a christmas market. there was also a shooting at an islamic mosquetoday in zurich, switzerland. but he's saying these are -- i'm quoting nowfrom his statement. he condemned the berlin attack, said: "theislamic state and other islamist terrorists are slaughtering christians as part of theirglobal jihad." and he said the u.s. -- he said civilizedworld must change its thinking. we don't have clear evidence yet of what wasbehind these attacks. he's assuming that it's all an islamic -- oran islamist motive here.

tamara keith: and the civilized world linecame in a tweet. this is not new. what is new is that donald trump is now president-elect. donald trump turning to twitter to declarethat something is islamist terrorism before the broader security community, before thewhite house, before others have been willing to declare that, before investigators havebeen willing to declare that, that is not new. he's done that before in past instance. judy woodruff: we saw that during the campaign,amy.

do we expect that this is just going to continuewhen he's president? amy walter: absolutely. and then the question becomes, what do wedo about it once he's in office and hear, of course, the broader dialogue from him andthe people around him? judy woodruff: well, we are -- as we haveknown about these, we have been waiting ourselves to decide or to know what exactly we can say,because the german authorities, the turkish authorities were only putting out so muchinformation. but it appears that donald trump has alreadydrawn these conclusions, and so we report them.

amy walter, tamara keith, thank you both. tamara keith: you're welcome. amy walter: thank you, judy. judy woodruff: next: of the stains left onour national heritage by the country's history of slavery and jim crow segregation, perhapsthe least discussed is the practice of racial lynchings, executions of african-americansdone outside the judicial system and often intended to subdue black communities intopassivity. hari sreenivasan looks at a plan to help bringthat conversation to the fore. hari sreenivasan: the plan is to commemoratevictims of racially motivated lynchings with

a memorial in montgomery, alabama. the design calls for some 800 columns, which,upon closer viewing, reveal themselves to be suspended from above in a way that mimicsa hanging. each will bear the names of lynching victims,over 4,000 in all, as well as the date and location of their deaths. a companion courtyard will hold duplicatecolumns which will be moved to the county of the lynchings each commemorates, once thatlocal community accepts it. a recent $10 million donation from siblingphilanthropists pat and jon stryker brings the project closer to its planned 2018 opening.

for more on all this, we turn to bryan stevenson,the founder of the equal justice initiative, which created the concept and is overseeingits completion. bryan, thanks for being with us. first, why do we need a memorial like this? bryan stevenson, founder, equal justice initiative:well, i think we're still haunted by our history of racial inequality. we are really burdened by this legacy. and i don't think we have acknowledged itadequately. we terrorized african-americans at the endof the 19th century and through half of the

20th century. the demographic geography of this countrywas shaped by this era of racial terror and lynching. the black people who went to cleveland andchicago and detroit went there as refugees and exiles from terror. and we haven't owned up to it. and i think we need to. it took us 15 years to build a 9/11 memorialhere in new york. and i think that's important.

i think it's critically necessary that weremember what happened on that day. but it's equally important that we acknowledgethis history of terror that i think still undermines our ability to be free, to be justwith one another, to kind of shake the burden of racial inequality that still underminesus in many areas. hari sreenivasan: this is part of a longerproject that you have been working on. you documented, i think, 8,000 lynchings overalmost a 75-year period. you even grabbed jars of soil from each ofthese sites. why? bryan stevenson: the american south is litteredwith the iconography of the confederacy.

and there are communities where the devastationof slavery, where the devastation of the genocide of native people has not been acknowledged,has not been recognized. lynchings provide an opportunity for us togo to very specific places. many of these acts of terror took place oncourthouse lawns, in front of schools, in front of churches, in front of places thatstill exist today. so, we have been asking people in the communityto engage in acts of truth-telling and acts of recovery, reconciliation, reparation. i think we need that in this country. in south africa, you have seen that.

in rwanda, you have seen that. in germany, you have seen that. i think they are healthier communities becausethey acknowledge their histories of mass atrocity and violence. i think we're less healthy because we haven'ttalked about the genocide of native people, we haven't talked about slavery, we haven'ttalked about lynching. and i think, to get there, we're going tohave to do these tasks. we're going to have to take these steps. and the community involvement, the soil collectionsare part of that process.

hari sreenivasan: the countries you mentioned,they didn't get there very quickly. there was resistance. is there resistance, especially in the southin the united states, when you bring up the idea of this memorial? bryan stevenson: i think there is certainlya reluctance. we have denied this history for a long time. i think we have become such a punitive society. we have the highest rate of incarcerationin the world. i think a lot of people are afraid to talkabout slavery, are afraid to talk about lynching

and segregation because they fear they willbe punished. we don't have an interest in punishing americafor this history, but we don't believe we can be free until we acknowledge this history. issues of police violence, issues of discrimination,issues of lack of diversity are rooted in an absence of truth-telling about our history. and so we have to just persuade people thatthere is something powerful and positive and beautiful that can come when we acknowledgethese histories, however painful, and make our ways forward. germany is a nation that we trust more todaybecause they don't have these -- they don't

have statutes to adolf hitler. they don't celebrate the nazis. rwanda is a healthier place because they haveacknowledged that legacy. so is south america. i think america has to replicate that if we'regoing to really be free. hari sreenivasan: i tried to give a groupdescription of what it looks like or what it will look like, but what are you hopingthat people take away if they walk through and visit the space? bryan stevenson: i hope people will beginto think differently about who we are and

what our past is. you know, this donation comes from jon andpat stryker, who are honoring their father, who stood for civil rights, who understoodthe importance of civil rights. and i think we have to create spaces. the holocaust memorials are very powerfulplaces. you walk through them, you understand things,you come out and you say never again. and i think we need to create spaces in americawhere we begin to confront this history of racial inequality and we walk out and we saynever again. we want them to be sober places.

we want them to be informational places, butwe also want them to be places where there's beauty, where there's hope, where there'sthe chance for transformation. and i think we can do that. but we can't do it without spending more timecreating the kind of cultural infrastructure that i hope this memorial will contributeto. hari sreenivasan: is there a through-lineor a legacy of lynching in the criminal justice system today? bryan stevenson: oh, absolutely. i mean, you know, at the end of the civilwar, we didn't really deal with the great

evil of american slavery. the great evil of american slavery was aninvoluntary servitude of forced labor. i believe the great evil of american slaverywas the narrative of racial difference that we created to legitimate it. and because we didn't address that in the13th amendment, i don't think slavery ended. i think it just evolved. and what we did in this country is, we beganto criminalize black people. in the late 19th century, convict leasingwas a new kind of slavery, where we put black people in jails and prisons, and then leasedthem to do the same work they would have done

as enslaved people. and that narrative of criminality was verymuch behind lynching, even though black people were being lynched for things like not usingthe colored entrance, for asking for better wages, for scolding white children. elizabeth lawrence was lynched in birmingham,alabama, because she told white kids to stop throwing stones at her. and even though these acts were not crimes,they challenged this racial hierarchy. they challenged this narrative of racial difference. and so we used the apparatus of punishment,the narrative of punishment to carry out these

lynchings. and when lynchings were shut down becauseof federal pressure, they moved indoors. and we had a criminal justice system and stillhave a criminal justice system that operates where too often there are presumptions ofdangerousness and guilt that get assigned to black and brown people. the wrongful convictions, the overincarcerationof people of color, these disparities in sentencing are rooted in this history of criminalizingand demonizing people of color that is made most dramatic in this era of lynching. and i think, if we understand it, we willdo better at overcoming it.

but we have to understand it first. and that's why these projects on slavery andlynching, for me, are so critical. hari sreenivasan: bryan stevenson of the equaljustice initiative, thanks for joining us. bryan stevenson: thank you. judy woodruff: he was proclaimed rock's nextbig thing in 1975, and he became the real thing with albums like "born to run," "darknesson the edge of town," "born in the usa," and many more. now bruce springsteen tells his own storyin a memoir. jeffrey brown paid him a visit to hear first-hand.

jeffrey brown: in his new memoir, bruce springsteenlooks back at his young, struggling and then little known self and writes: "i wasn't modestin the assessment of my abilities. of course, i thought i was a phony. that is the way of the artist. but i also thought i was the realest thingyou had ever seen." bruce springsteen, musician: that's right. most artists i know consider themselves tobe phonies, along with the feeling that there's something that you're doing is essential,essential to communicate, and deeply, deeply real.

jeffrey brown: springsteen has been rockinghis way through marathon, arena-sized concerts for decades, a kind of working-class rock'n' roll hero to millions of devoted fans. in the recording studio he built at this ruralnew jersey home, we talked about becoming bruce springsteen, the story he tells in hisbook, "born to run." bruce springsteen: it was a very differenttype of writing from songwriting. jeffrey brown: in what way? bruce springsteen: a pop song is a condensedversion of a life in three minutes, whereas, when you go to write your prose, you haveto find the rhythm in your words, and you have to find the rhythm in the voice thatyou have found and the way you're speaking.

jeffrey brown: what about that voice, though? because in songs -- i think of writers i havetalked to, or poets, and there's always the question of, how much of that is you? bruce springsteen: i would say, in your memoir,it's you. i think that, when you're writing your songs,there's always a debate about whether, is that you in the song? is it not you in the song? jeffrey brown: what's the answer? bruce springsteen: so, every song has a pieceof you in it, because just general regret,

love. you have to basically zero in on the truthof those particular emotions. and then you can fill it out in any characterand in any circumstance that you want. if you have written really well, people willswear that it happened to you. jeffrey brown: springsteen grew up in theworking-class town of freehold, new jersey, of italian and irish stock, adored and spoiledby his mother and grandparents, ignored and denigrated by a brooding, drinking, distantfather, a figure who would obsess him personally and musically. bruce springsteen: initially, i had my conversationswith him through my music.

and that was the most effective, not the greatestway to do it, but it was certainly -- it was the most effective for us. jeffrey brown: i mean, but you write earlyon, "when my dad looked at me, he didn't see what he needed to see." bruce springsteen: yes. now... jeffrey brown: well, you're going, yes, now,but i mean, that's hard when you're a young boy. bruce springsteen: it is hard.

it is hard. i think that it's a natural thing for parentsto look for reflections of themselves in their children and feel a certain pride there. so if your child is very, very different,or perhaps if he's very, very similar, it makes you uncomfortable. so, there was a lot of that when i was young,and it took a long time to get through. jeffrey brown: reconciliation would come later,along with an understanding of the role of depression in his father's and his own. from the beginning, though, the young springsteenshowed a ferocious drive and sense of his

own mission, first as a king of the bar bandsin central and south jersey. i started to make a list of the clubs youplayed early on. these are not high-rent places, right? the angle inn trailer park, cavatelli's pizza,the i.b. club, surf and the sea beach club, long branchitalian american club, the pandemonium club. you probably remember each and every one ofthem. bruce springsteen: yes, i remember those alot more than some of the madison square garden and other things. jeffrey brown: is that right?

bruce springsteen: of course. they were all so distinctive in their ownway, and they all drew their own little clique of kids. and it was such a formative moment in yourlife that, you know, you were just coming into being. jeffrey brown: you write about your voice. you say, about my voice, "first of all, idon't have much of one." jeffrey brown: right? but you worked at it.

bruce springsteen: initially just soundedawful, just so terribly awful, but there was nothing i could do about it. so, i just kept singing and kept singing andkept singing. and i studied other singers, so i would learnhow to phrase, and learn how to breathe. and the main thing was, i learned how to inhabitmy song. jeffrey brown: which means what? bruce springsteen: what you were singing aboutwas believable and convincing, that's the key to a great singer. a great singer has to learn how to inhabita song.

you may not be able to hit all the notes. that's ok. you may not have the clearest tone. you may not have the greatest range. but if you can inhabit your song, you cancommunicate. jeffrey brown: the early songs, though, arewhat i would call, like, word drunk. they're so many words in there that you'rebarely catching your breath as you're singing bruce springsteen: well, i was influencedby dylan very intensely. and i had a rhyming dictionary.

a man armed with a rhyming dictionary is adangerous man. (laughter) bruce springsteen: so, yes, the words camefast and furious. jeffrey brown: a dictionary and, more important,a great band, the e street band, which includes singer patti scialfa, his wife since 1991. springsteen never liked his nickname, theboss. bruce springsteen: i had no credit cards. i had no checks. i was cash only until i was probably 30 yearsold.

jeffrey brown: but the boss is what he became,deciding early on that, to endure, he would have to treat music like a business. bruce springsteen: well, that has to happen. if you're a band leader, you need that typeof discipline and dedication in the guys you're playing with. we came from where professionalism wasn'ta dirty word, as i say. and so we worked like the old soul bands worked,very intensely, and very methodically, in great detail. jeffrey brown: you even call it a benevolentdictatorship.

bruce springsteen: that's what it is. jeffrey brown: that's what it is. bruce springsteen: small unit democracy, ifound early on, didn't work for me. and the band contributes enormously. i wouldn't have gotten anywhere near wherei was without them. but it's basically the buck stops here sortof situation. jeffrey brown: but are you a control freak? that's sort of the what -- i think you saythat. bruce springsteen: yes, i am, probably lessnow than i used to be.

i think, when i was young, i was -- becauseyou're insecure, you really -- you're very controlling. now i'm moderately controlling, i would say. jeffrey brown: but you use that word insecure,because, frankly, i'm reading this thing, and it's such a mix of sort of insecuritiesand sense of self. bruce springsteen: that's the artist's way. jeffrey brown: that's the artist's way. explain that to me. bruce springsteen: most artists i know hadone person in their life who told them they

were the second coming of the baby jesus,and another person that told them they weren't worth anything, and they believed them both,you know? and so you go through the rest of your lifein pursuit of both of those things, proving that both of those things are true. and you feel like the burden of proof is onyou. it doesn't matter what happened last nightor the night -- or tomorrow night. it's all about what you're doing with thisaudience right now. and insecurity, natural part of being an artist. jeffrey brown: it is always there.

bruce springsteen: along with a driving, driving,driving ego, a vanity, and the self-confidence. so you have got to have both of those things. that's what makes it interesting. that's what makes someone -- that's what makesyou want to watch someone, or want to listen to someone, are those particular complexities. jeffrey brown: my conversation with brucespringsteen continues tomorrow night with a look at his lifelong bouts of depression,his love of reading, and the election of donald trump. for the "pbs newshour," i'm jeffrey brown.

judy woodruff: now to our "newshour" shares,something that caught our eye that might be of interest to you, too. every december, hundreds of tuba and euphoniumplayers gather in cities around the world to perform holiday tunes. we recently spoke with chris quade, one ofthe organizers of tubachristmas at washington, d.c.'s kennedy center, about what makes theevents so special. chris quade, tubachristmas: my name is chrisquade. i'm one of the coordinators of tubachristmas. i'm also the emcee.

the original tubachristmas was in new yorkcity, and that was 1973. in 1974, they started d.c. tubachristmas. people thought of the tuba as a back-row instrument,shouldn't play too soft, because it can't, shouldn't play too fast, because it can't. to me, tubachristmas represents breaking outof the tuba stereotype. it's been the same music for 43 years. the arrangements work. they are interesting enough to hold the attentionof the players. they are simple enough to put together inone rehearsal.

they lay in a good range, and they have theright amount of fast and slow. i think the magic of those arrangements isreally what makes this work. it's great because it is timeless. we can't play top 40. we'd have to change the book every year. and it's tubas. top 40 doesn't really work. it's a kind part concert, part educationalexperience, part reunion. i think every year, i imagine, come on, theyare going to traipse in from miles and miles

away into the city and come up just to dothis? it's a pain, right? and they come all the time. and there are so many young players. that's the thing that gets me every year. they're excited by it. this is fun. if you have children come here, and they havegot a book of music in front of them, and everyone is very somber, they are going tobe much more nervous about what they are doing.

if you have lights on this tuba, and garlandon this tuba, and this guy's got reindeer antlers, it creates an atmosphere where youare just trying to have fun. tubachristmas, 300 tuba players, and it'sa beautiful sound. judy woodruff: tubas at christmas, bruce springsteen. you have got to love tonight's show. so, on the "newshour" online right now: whatwas the best book you read in 2016? our staff at the "newshour" shares their favoriteswith you, whether you're looking for your next good read or shopping for holiday gifts. all that and more is on our web site, pbs.org/newshour.

and that's the "newshour" for tonight. join us online and again right here tomorrowevening. for all of us at the "pbs newshour," thankyou, and good night.

Monday, October 30, 2017

rent apartment seattle


fireside chateric schmidt with secretary julian castrojanuary 7, 2016 >>eric schmidt: well, good morning. good morning,everyone. you don't have to say "good morning" back.it's not class. good morning, everyone. it's my pleasure tohave the secretary with us. and i wanted to remind everybody that this is a public eventand there's members of the press in the audience. so folks who have questions, be aware of that.i thought we should start by welcoming you back to palo alto and stanford; right?>>sect. julian castro: that's right. first of all, thank you, eric, for having me. it'sgreat to be here at google. and i was telling

you and some of the folks that every timei get back here and the weather is like this, i wonder why i didn't stay in the first place.>>eric schmidt: i had a different question, you graduated in 1996?>>sect. julian castro: that's right. >>eric schmidt: so had you joined google asit was founded? >>sect. julian castro: i'd have a lot nicercar today for sure. >>eric schmidt: so you went from stanford-- basically, you grew up in texas, and you went -->>sect. julian castro: in san antonio. >>eric schmidt: which surprisingly, you wentback to. so i want to explore that. >>sect. julian castro: surprisingly? that'sthe best place in the world.

>>eric schmidt: right? good.you went from -- and i'm joking, obviously. we went from -- you went from stanford toharvard. right? so how do you go from san antonio, hispanicfamily, you know, to stanford, to harvard? is that why you've ultimately -- you're oneof the youngest political rising leaders in our country, one of the fastest-rising politicalleaders. did you know that you were going to become a political leader?>>sect. julian castro: you know, oddly enough, it was at stanford when i went -- becausei grew up, my brother, joaquin and i, i have a twin brother, joaquin. and he says the wayto tell us apart is i'm a minute uglier than he is. i'm actually a minute older. we wentthrough the public schools of san antonio.

and my mother had been very active in theold chicano movement, the mexican-american civil rights movement of the late '60s andearly '70s. we grew up mostly with my mother and grandmother. we both got scholarshipsto get to stanford. we had never seen the campus. it was the secondtime that we'd ever been on an airplane. and i remember that we got there on i think itwas wednesday, september 23rd, 1992, because stanford's on a quarter system, they alwaysstart late. when i got to stanford, it was the first time that i had ever really beenaway from san antonio. and i could see the city with different eyes. i had gone to aschool that -- a high school that was probably 85% mexican-american, not very diverse. obviously,a much more diverse community, people from

all over the united states and over threedozen countries. and i could compare what was good and whatneeded improvement in my community. so, you know, the -- what needed improvement was,in the bay area, you had a place that was -- had better education levels, better incomelevels, more innovative, ready for the future. in san antonio, it was a city of about a millionpeople, a wonderful place to raise a family. a place where people of different backgroundshad generally gotten along well together. and the way that i've always described itis, it was a big city where if two people passed each other on the street downtown,they still look each other in the eye. there's not that disconnection that often happensas communities get bigger and bigger.

so my interest in politics and going intopublic service came out of how could you combine the best of that to have.a community that was innovative and had good income levels and education levels, readyfor the future, entrepreneurial, but also had a good character to it?>>eric schmidt: but when you went to harvard, you -- you know, in -- because at the time,obviously, you were a fantastic student, also a minority relative to the dominant whiteculture, you would have easily gone and become very, very successful in the conventionalworld, corporate world. what was it that made you go back? you wentback to san antonio, right, to your hometown. again, you're incredibly young. you're theyoungest councilman, the youngest mayor. you're

elected. you run, you lose narrowly. you thenwin again. and you're only, like, 32. >>sect. julian castro: 34, yeah.[ laughter ] >>eric schmidt: and people said -- listento him. and people say -- by the way, he looks 22.right? so there must be something in your sense ofmission that you're trying to do. >>sect. julian castro: yeah. because i -->>eric schmidt: and in san antonio, you were seen as one of the most innovative mayorsin the country at an age where you're 20 years younger than everybody else.>>sect. julian castro: what was burning inside me was that i felt very, very blessed in myown life to have this great opportunity of

going to college and going to law school.i grew up with a grandmother who had dropped out in elementary school. and she worked asa maid, a cook, and a baby-sitter her whole life. and she raised my mother as a singleparent. and my mom actually had had the chance to go and graduate from high school and goon to college. and i felt as though by going back to sanantonio, that i could make a contribution in public service to make sure that more peoplethat were growing up like me could actually have the opportunity to go to college andthen pursue their own american dream. and that's pretty much what drove me.in my first two summers, as you know, the traditional thing in law school is that folkswill go and be a summer associate somewhere.

so i actually -- after the first summer, iactually went back to san francisco and i was a summer associate at baker & mckenzie,which was sometimes referred to as the mcdonald's at that time of law firms, because they hadsomething like 60 different offices all over the world.and the second year, my brother and i were at akin gump and at vinson & elkins back intexas. and then when we graduated from law school, we both went back and were at akingump for a while before we pursued our public service careers.>>eric schmidt: so at this point, you're sufficiently successful as the mayor that you get on thesort of interesting national character list that the sort of white house is working on.and you get involved in their programs. and

then you become one of the youngest appointmentsat the national level in the obama administration, as secretary of housing and urban development.can you summarize for us what the problems in housing and urban development are? becausethey strike me as sort of overwhelming. >>sect. julian castro: yeah. i mean, it'sfair to say that they are very, very significant. they're massive. i saw this both as a mayorand now even more so as hud secretary. to begin with, we have a rental affordablecrisis out there. a few months ago, the national low-income housing coalition put out a piercingstudy that said basically that there isn't a single community in the united states ofany size where if you're working full-time, minimum wage, you can afford the rent on atwo-bedroom apartment. and very, very few

places where you can afford the rent on evena one-bedroom apartment. >>eric schmidt: so how do people make it?how do they get by in this situation? >>sect. julian castro: what folks are doingright now is that you have an unprecedented number of families who are paying more thana third of their income in rent. rent is taking up, eating up more and more of their income.or they're doubling up. or, of course, in our country, we still do have a significantchallenge with homelessness. although the president has shown great leadership on that.homelessness since 2010 has been trending downward. there are cities where it's goingin the opposite direction. but in general, it has been going down.so you have that affordable crisis. the home

ownership rate in the united states rightnow is at a four-decade low. obviously, we went through the housing crisis. and if thestory ten years ago, in 2005, was that it was too easy to get a home loan, the storytoday is that oftentimes for middle-class families, for folks who have an average creditscore but who would be responsible, they can't get a home loan. it's too tough.and lending to minority communities is at a 13- or 14-year low.so you combine those two things of less home ownership, more people competing in the rentalmarket, and it adds up to a massive challenge in terms of affordable and housing opportunity.>>eric schmidt: and -- so what are the solutions that you would like to see?my understanding of sort of the hud that you've

inherited is, because you have a republicancongress, there's not much that can be changed in the sense of financial allocation, therules that you've been given in the few years that you've been able to be at hud. in otherwords, your degrees of freedom of fixing this are lower than it might appear to an outsider,because you can't get the money moved around and things like that.>>sect. julian castro: yeah. >>eric schmidt: is that true?>>sect. julian castro: let's start with a baseline of, we need more resources to beinvested in affordable housing. and because you have a fairly conservative congress, we'renot getting the kind of resources that -- to meet that demand.also, at hud, hud as a department has been

more and more stressed or burdened over time.to give you an example of that, the day that reagan walked into the oval office in januaryof 1981, hud had over 16,000 employees. today, it has about 8,000 employees. so it'sbeen cut in half. so this idea that you hear that people think that every department ofthe federal government has just run amok and it's growing, that's not true.so that's a baseline. however, that doesn't mean that we're powerless.that means that we do have to be more innovative. it means that you have to make the resourcesstretch further. it also means, frankly -- and i saw this as a mayor -- that at the statelevel and at the local level, that what ends up happening is that states and localitiesend up taking up more of the slack.

>>eric schmidt: there's a large amount ofpublic housing, often very old, in america. do you manage that? or is it managed by thecities and states, with money that you give them?>>sect. julian castro: it's managed by public housing authorities.>>eric schmidt: okay. >>sect. julian castro: and there are over3,000 public housing authorities out there, from public housing authorities that are ruraland very small, to a housing authority like san francisco or chicago that have thousandsand thousands of units under their jurisdiction. but it's federal money.>>eric schmidt: 'cause one of those things i wanted to explore as part of why you'rehere is, we -- you suggested, and we have

entered into a partnership with a number ofother companies to try to get -- i would just describe -- i'm going to use the word "publichousing" because i don't know how better to describe it -- connected. can we sort of gothrough why that's important. why isn't it obviously already occurring?you know, what are the roadblocks? why have you made this -- i think this isone of your signature campaigns in the white house.>>sect. julian castro: yeah. you know, i got the call from president obama asking whetheri'd be interested in this role on april 16th, 2014. and i remember that because it's notevery day that the president calls you, asking if you want a job. unless some of y'all havethat experience. i don't.

and the first thing that i thought about waswhat we could do to help -- and let me be very explicit -- i don't believe that helpingis a dirty word. that if you do it right in government, that that's something that's positive.but how we could help folks who live in public housing, where the median household incomeis about $12,500, how we could help them become more upwardly mobile and get out of publichousing. >>eric schmidt: how does somebody live on$12,500? >>sect. julian castro: i mean, they're gettinga very significant subsidy of their housing cost. oftentimes, maybe other subsidies.that includes also senior citizens who are on social security. and so, you know.and i believe that, basically, that brainpower

is the new currency of success in the 21stcentury global economy, and that for america to be as competitive as possible, we needto ensure that everyone, up and down the income scale, and particularly young people, have21st-century tools to compete in the job market. and that over half of the folks who are lowincome and the vast majority of people who live in public housing don't have internetaccess or in some cases the community is wired or, in theory, they could have it, but thenthey can't afford it. so either way, they're not reaping the benefitsof being connected right now. so connecthome is a pilot project to connect28 communities, 27 cities and one tribal community, of folks who live in public housing to theinternet. and we're very proud of that effort,

very proud of google fiber's role in the effort.you all have been fantastic. and at the end of the day, we want to do twothings. number one, we want to ensure that folks get that access, they get connected.and secondly, we want to be able to measure what difference that makes in their lives.because as you all know, it's not enough to just connect them. we need to get more rigorousabout being able to demonstrate the impact in their lives that that makes.and ultimately, the long-term goal is that we see more of those kids who are going tobe connected that do better on their third-grade math and reading tests, that are more likelyto graduate from high school, that are more likely to go on to college, and, hopefully,into companies like google and others, and

to reach their dreams, and that that connectionwill have been one small part of that. >>eric schmidt: what i remember when you firstcalled on this was the observation that many of these housing units are reasonably dense,they're reasonably vertical. so they're particularly amenable to a shared service, running a fiberline. you can serve it with -- very many -- very many, many people very, very efficiently.it's sort of a no-brainer as a public act for corporations and you guys to sort of makethis happen. and the benefits are very quick. >>sect. julian castro: absolutely. and asyou all know, you're partnering with connecthome in several cities. and, by the way, i wantto say a big thank you to google fiber. today we learned that they're going to be connectingthe residents in kansas city, the public housing

residents that they're serving to gigabitservice for free, which is a great victory for that community in kansas city.>>eric schmidt: we're very, very proud of that.and, you know, once you -- the simple rule about fiber is, once you've got it in place,it's just a godsend; right? because the bandwidth is there, the service is there. you just haveto get these things wired. and one of our biggest projects is makingsure that the sort of local regulatory municipal barriers that get in the way of doing that,right, for whatever historic reason, are sort of eliminated. and your organization has helpedthat throughout the cities. we're now up to, let's see, 20 additionalcities in six metro areas that we're now designing

for. we're very operational in kansas cityand in provo and in austin. right? so it really is working.and our strategy is, of course, you know a national strategy, where we're in this forthe long run. do you think -- what i can never tell withprograms like connecthome is, is it likely to become a truly national program over adecade? in other words, it looks to us like this is going to be hugely successful in the30 or so. but there's a lot more than 30. how do we get to 1,000 and 3,000?>>sect. julian castro: i believe that it will scale. and my goal is that by the time wewalk out of there, on january 20th of 2017, i would like for us to be able to say thatwe have commitments so that every single household

in public housing will be connected.i do believe that that can happen. you have a number of partners who have beencommitted to connecthome. and i know that we and others will keep prodding everybodyto try and get there. and then after that, you know, there's hudassisted housing that's mixed-income housing. and so there's a base that we're working from.and i think the drive to grow it. and so i am confident that it'll become much strongerthan 28 communities. let me also just say, eric, that, you know-- and i saw this as mayor when we started thinking about google fiber there in san antonio,that you can see these fascinating issues that present themselves with sort of the neweconomy and the old economy and how that interacts

with public law-making at the local level,the state level, and the federal level. and the use of poles, for instance, and the battlesthat you all have had in different communities around that is a very good example of that.tesla in its battle with the car dealers in state legislatures -- you all know this one,of course. usually, you have as to go through a dealership at the state level to sell acar in many places. tesla can only have a car there, it's almost like a show piece,like a museum, you can only go see it. they can't even set up a sale.another one is uber and lyft and all of the issues surrounding that and regulation atthe local level. ,and then these craft brewers and their abilityto distribute versus the beer distributors.

so what you see is this fascinating intersectionof the new economy and disruptive technologies and i think the way that local government,state government, and federal government is sort of doing a head-spinning and trying tofigure out how to respond. i think maybe the best thing that comes from the work that youall do and others do is helping to educate public policymakers on how we should takein these things as they change and understand systems differently and not be afraid to regulatein a different way, or in some cases, not regulate at all.>>eric schmidt: right. >>sect. julian castro: because things havechanged. >>eric schmidt: we would certainly take theposition that more -- that allowing a space

for innovation, right, is key. because innovationis how companies are formed, jobs are created, wealth is created. and you can imagine thereare plenty of problems in cities that can be solved if the space were -- the legal spaceallowed for a local innovator to create a company to solve this particular problem.when i was much younger, there was a fear about strong mayors. and in the last coupleof decades, there's been a sort of view that the government was relatively dysfunctionalunless you had a strong mayor. and we went through a period of what i would argue wasa strong mayor. but you were a strong mayor. in the internal politics of these cities,why is the mayor -- it's a simple question, but why is the mayor's power important andhow is it exercised? as you know, cities can

be understood as the innovation engines nowin america. >>sect. julian castro: well, it's importantbecause leadership at the top, i think, whether it's in a company or at one of these levelsof government, where the leader is focused is oftentimes what's going to move the organizationand where the attention of the organization is. and the position of mayor is important,and a mayor has strength or doesn't have strength, i think, basically by a couple of things.number one, whether they have the votes with the people they serve with on the city councilto actually get something done. because at the end of the day, that's the body that makespolicy decisions. and whether they're effective in the organization in getting that organizationto execute well.

and those two things, i think, are reallywhat add up to whether someone is successful or not successful in that office.>>eric schmidt: but i think for our audience here, people are often very, very confusedabout why problems -- engineers often get confused about politics, because engineersare rational and politics is often irrational. [ laughter ]it's -- sorry. [ laughter ]>>sect. julian castro: is that a comment about the 2016 election cycle?>>eric schmidt: we're going to get to that. i'm going to compare you to marco rubio.the -- >>sect. julian castro: i'm not wearing bootstoday, so --

>>eric schmidt: if we talk about the bay area,you've got enormous wealth, enormous creativity, many people would say that the financial resultsfor the stock market for the last year have largely been tech-driven. right, there's alot of reasons to think that this area in particular is a jewel. and yet we have thesecrippling housing problems and crippling transportation problems. and i don't need to tell anyonehere in the audience how difficult this has become.why are these problems not fixable? in other words, it's pretty obvious to me that if youhad a bunch of people in a room and said we've got lots of smart people coming in, lots ofpeople who are being dislocated in housing. we need more affordable housing, we need moreof this and more of that and so forth.

why does it not work that way?>>sect. julian castro: well, it doesn't work that way for -- i agree with you that it oughtto be able to work that way. and i do think that we can get closer than we are.but let's just take the issue of housing in san francisco. right? i imagine there area lot of folks in this room that are dealing with that. or in any other city that is ahot market. it doesn't work in a linear fashion becausepeople who represent different areas and different interests get pressure. then sometimes theylisten to that pressure in a proportionate way, and sometimes they listen to that flasha disproportionate way. why can't we build more affordable housingin many areas? because you get a lot of nimbyism.

i saw this every week in san antonio. someonewanted to come in and create more density. then you'd have all these folks line in thisfront of the city council and say, no way. keep this -- and i'm going to vote againstyou if you vote for this. and for that elected official making thatone decision, right, and not oftentimes putting it all together, because they all add up,you know, are you going to make 200 people angry? and for what, in their mind?>>eric schmidt: do you think that the higher levels of government, so the state or federalgovernment, should play a more directive role to support growth and development of, forexample, housing in general, transportation in general, affordable housing? or are youmore in favor of letting the local authorities,

mayors primarily, sort this out with the concomitantissues that you're well familiar with? >>sect. julian castro: let me say that i dobelieve there are a lot of places where mayors and councils and county commissions are doinga lot of innovative work and good work and creating more affordable housing opportunities.but you always have that political reality, too, that sometimes cuts against that grain.the -- generally, the posture has been to deliver resources to local communities andas much as possible, to let those local communities determine how they're going to spark greaterhousing opportunity. the best example of this are two of our bread-and-butterprograms, which are community development block grants, it's a 41-year-old program now,cdbg, and home funding, which started in 1992.

and these are block grants to local communitiesand states that gives them a lot of flexibility on how they use this money.so you might have one community that is using that money mostly to rehab elderly housingand another that is using that as gap financing to create more affordable housing, but itruns the gamut. now, let me give you an example of somethingthat i'm telling mayors more and more these days.we're saying, because cdbg is often the largest allocation of money that they get, citiesget from hud. we're saying, look, what we see out there is that we need more housing.we need more affordable housing. and at the same time, only about 29% of cdbg money isbeing used directly for housing. they're using

it for infrastructure projects. because it'sflexible. is it -- i'm saying, mayor x or y or z, youknow that you have an affordability issue in your city, and yet at the same time, you'redoling out one million dollars here for this project, for another project instead of usingthose resources in a focused way on housing. and so to get back to one of my original points,yes, we need more resources. that's definitely a big part of the story. but we also needto be as smart as possible about the resources that are there and that we do have.>>eric schmidt: i think as we sort of finish and move to audience questions, i do wantto talk to you a bit about the political landscape. you're often mentioned as a very significantfuture leader on the democratic side. you

are -- have been, in fact, compared to marcorubio. i've never quite understood in a hispaniccontext the politics on the hispanic side. presumably, a hispanic candidate would bein favor of immigration, legalization, and so forth and so on. can you sort of dissectwhat's going on for somebody who's not hispanic, sort of explain, how do the politics work?>>sect. julian castro: it's a good question, you know. and my perspective on it was firstinformed, of course, by growing up in a city that was 60% hispanic, mostly mexican-american,and now having served as mayor, and then now at a national level getting to visit communitieslike florida and like northern virginia that are hispanic but very diverse, people fromall over latin america.

the hispanic community generally leans democratic.in 2012, you know, everybody knows that about just over 70% voted for president obama. atthe same time, there are pockets of hispanics, particularly in places like florida and cuban-americansand especially the older generation of cuban-americans, and in some places of texas that have leanedrepublican. and so what you have in marco rubio and tedcruz i think are two good examples of folks from a hispanic community that generally hadleaned republican. that is changing. in fact, 2012 was a breakthrough year because the presidentactually won more than 50% of the hispanic vote in florida and a large percentage ofthe cuban-american vote. but i think that often there's this disconnectin the media centers of the united states.

and i'm thinking especially of new york. idon't think that they get, oftentimes, the diversity of the hispanic community in andof itself, whether that's culturally or politically. i also think it's true that the democraticparty can't, you know, -- cannot forever just count on getting the hispanic vote. i haveseen that in texas, you know. i saw when george bush ran for governor in '94 and '98 and whenhe ran for president. >>eric schmidt: very popular.>>sect. julian castro: yeah. he got about 40% of the vote.so it's possible. the problem that republicans have is not thepersonalities, because they have cruz and rubio, and they have susana martinez and governorsandoval in nevada. the problem is, their

politics is their policies. they've gone crazyon immigration. they've gone way out there to the right. on tax policy, on educationpolicy, on just about all of the bread-and-butter issues, the kitchen table issues that matterto the hispanic community, they're way to the right. and i don't see from here to novemberthat they're going to be able to get back in to the middle zone that i think would makemost hispanics comfortable with them, even if they had somebody like marco rubio runningat the top of the ticket. >>eric schmidt: no political conversationis finished without bringing up donald trump's name.so one theory of what's going on goes something like this: that many, many people have notseen economic growth over the last decade.

this is well established mathematically. andthere are many theories as to why this growth and success has not occurred. one would beimmigrants taking your jobs. anti-muslim feelings, all those sorts of things. that can be arguedas a trump position. another one would be it's the banks and theelites and the so forth. and that would be sort of the sanders position. people are makingthese arguments. and the core point in this argument is thatthe elites, which most of us travel with, missed this anger, and that the anger is notjust exemplified by trump, but exemplified by all of the candidates who are non-traditional,right, non-mainstream candidates, which there are in both parties.do you agree with that? you're a person who's

lived in both worlds; right? you grew up -->>sect. julian castro: sure. >>eric schmidt: you grew up in a tough environment.you went to the best schools and so forth. do you believe the elites missed this? doyou believe that there is a gap between, shall we say, the common person, the common person'sexperience, which is exemplified by this rather odd politics as the elite like to describeit, and the elites? >>sect. julian castro: i believe that thatgap is growing. and i definitely believe that there's a strong frustration there.i vehemently disagree with what trump has put forward as a solution. and i do agreewith those who have said that, basically, it's this boogeyman or shiny object politicsof sort of redirecting people's anger.

i believe what we need to do more of is whatthe president has focused on these last several years, which is, you know, a plan for universalpre-k. so people get started strong and are able to graduate and go on and reach theirdreams. that we make community college free thosefirst two years and make college more affordable and reduce student debt so that folks canget on with prospering in their lives. that we make home ownership for responsiblefamilies more accessible. so, you know, at the end of the day, whatwe need to do is to get back to the blueprint that gave us a strong middle class in theunited states. and that's what the president has been trying to do. and that's what i believethat secretary clinton would do as well if

she were -->>eric schmidt: and you've endorsed her as a presidential candidate.>>sect. julian castro: sure. >>eric schmidt: maybe we should move to questionsfrom the audience as well as we have some submitted questions which we call the dory.so we can start with one. and if -- there's a mic here as well.the -- let's see if i have my list here. the most attractive internet access optionfor -- and i'm reading this from a submitted question -- for disadvantaged families isprepaid mobile broadband. what are the fundamental reasons for its extremely high cost in theu.s.? in my country of origin -- this person is not a u.s. person -- it costs less thana tenth of what it does here. in other words,

why does mobile broadband cost so much?>>sect. julian castro: number one, i have a feeling there are probably three dozen peoplethat can answer that question better than i can in this room.[ laughter ] however, i mean, let me say that i'll giveyou a good example from my hometown of, i think -- you know, again, to go back to thisissue of the regulatory environment and how we can undo some of that in order to makeaccess more affordable. san antonio is one of a number of cities thathas a municipal utility. we own a municipal utility. and at some point in the early '90sor mid-'90s, they went out and built a fiber network, the municipal utility did. they builtthis fiber network throughout the city or

throughout their service area. in the late1990s, the texas legislature passed a statute that said that cities that owned that kindof fiber network could not provide -- use it to provide internet access to homes, totheir citizens. they could use it for a very -->>eric schmidt: really? >>sect. julian castro: -- limited number ofthings, and only for certain educational institutions, like universities and libraries.so you have this community, and it's not the only one, that is sitting on this fiber networkthat's not able to use it to provide cheaper, good internet service.now, you could undo that statute to allow them to contract with a company to go in thereand run that network.

but i think that we need to find more waysthat we can lower the cost. >>eric schmidt: but was this just an industrylobbying effort that -- i mean, sounds to me like you have a municipal asset and peopleare telling you you can't use it. >>sect. julian castro: it's a company thatshall go unnamed right now. >>eric schmidt: not google.>>sect. julian castro: no. it was not google. but there was lobbying at the state levelto pass that kind of law. and that's a good example, to me, of -- that we're not maximizingour potential sometimes. >>eric schmidt: next question is, fcc defiancebroadband as 25 megabits, giving close to $10 billion of carriers to speed up deploymentof internet service to rural america. isps

are considered regional monopolies by many,in other words, this questioner. some states are trying to ban municipal broadband.>>sect. julian castro: yeah. >>eric schmidt: can you make sense of this?>>sect. julian castro: yeah, i mean, to go to this point, from my experience in san antonio,that -- at least that case did not make a lot of sense.you know, i believe that we need all hands on deck.>>eric schmidt: to your knowledge, is it still under this restriction?>>sect. julian castro: it is. sure. yeah. so when i was mayor, i sat on the cps energyboard. that has not changed. and it's not the only community. i remember reading backthen of other communities in the united states.

not many had a network that was as developedas san antonio's, but there are some. i just think that we need all hands on deckin terms of trying to make it more accessible and more affordable for folks to get access.>>eric schmidt: now, i'm reading -- yes, sir. we have a question. let's go ahead.>>> quick question. if you found yourself to be the vice president of the united statesa year from now, a, how would you feel about the opportunity, and, b, what are some ofthe things you would look (indiscernible). [ laughter ]>>sect. julian castro: no. i appreciate the question and the confidence that you havein me. [ laughter ]and thank you. however, you know, i'm trying

to do a good job at hud. and, you know, just-- i've seen many times in life that the best way to make sure that you have a good futureis not to forget about your present, what's in front of you right now. so i'm trying todo a great job at hud. and then whatever the future brings, we'll see.all right. >>eric schmidt: yes, sir.>>> hi. thank you very much for being here. >>sect. julian castro: is that a cal shirtyou have on? >>eric schmidt: it might be.[ applause ] i was thinking about taking it off, i thoughtit will be fine. >>sect. julian castro: you all beat navy theother day.

>>> air force.>>sect. julian castro: air force. >>> it was a great game.my question is that you mentioned a little bit earlier that sometimes cities, you know,they have large funds allocated to them for urban development projects and housing, buta lot of times they don't use it for housing. and so i know that a lot of times the federalgovernment has requirements for states and cities that once they meet those requirements,then they get the money. and it's generally for a purpose like urban development, butsometimes they can use it for other things. i was wondering if your department has consideredputting those requirements also on the money. once you get it, here's what you have to do,say, you know, maybe for ten years, you have

to use this for housing, and then that wouldput a sizable dent in the problem. >>sect. julian castro: no. thank you verymuch for the question. so we do have a decent amount of money thatis more restricted in terms of that it has to be used for housing.a lot of that money doesn't flow directly to cities; it goes to these public housingauthorities or states. also, the treasury has a very important and significant program,the low-income housing tax credit. they administer it, treasury does, that goes to states. andthe states distribute those low-income housing tax credits to local communities. and that'sjust for affordable housing. so, you know, i don't want to give the impressionthat there's not any resources that are -- in

fact, most of the resources are more restricted.however, the two big block grant programs, so to speak, are a little less so. and especially-- i'm really thinking about community development block grants. because home, it is shaped alittle bit more for housing. >>> thank you.>>eric schmidt: yes, ma'am. >>> thank you so much for joining us todayand for everything you do with hud. really appreciate all the efforts you've made tohelp people nationally, but so many of the communities that you are serving like throughconnecthome, specialty minority communities. we talked about google fiber and the rolethat can play. the other thing that affects them with mobile, knowing diverse communitiesare more likely to buy a smartphone than any

other demographic, latinos in particular.many tech companies are so quick to look to other countries where we see a need, the nextbillion users, something i know eric is particularly passionate about. and often, many of us whocome from communities like these think about the need to look in our neighborhoods here.when we think of innovation and thinking about how can we possibly understand what it meansto come from a family that makes $12,500, that family probably has a smartphone or hopesto have one as their first means of connecting to the web.so knowing all that, what are your thoughts on the responsibility we have as googlersto better understand these communities and develop for them?>>sect. julian castro: you know, it's a wonderful

question, and i know that you all are doingsome fantastic work in the mission district and other places to try and help communitiesmaximize their potential. and i believe that there is a tremendous amount of low-hangingfruit out there, and so many young people that are growing up that have the potentialto be like y'all here, googlers and folks who have graduated from college and, you know,reached your dreams or are reaching your dreams. and so how we figure out ways to scale beingable to improve their circumstances and their trajectory is fantastically important. andso i'm glad that y'all are a part of that. you bring up an issue that i think, you know,leads to a real irony, which is that especially for low-income communities, in public housing,and communities of color that too oftentimes

are low income, they overuse technology inmany ways. you know, have a smartphone, use apps like twitter and facebook and instagram.and so you see that -- both that there is a market there that probably is being undertappeda lot of times and that the private sector, i think, needs to gear itself even more towardand focus on. i think there's a responsibility there to enhance the number of folks who comefrom those communities who are able to participate in the success of companies. and i also believethat in this 21st century, that as you look around the globe, that the united states findsitself in this unprecedented competition for talent and brainpower with -- with nationsaround the world that are producing tons of young people that are intelligent and talentedand tech-savvy. and we need to do our part

to make sure that we don't let any of thatpotential go to waste. and so, you know, i applaud y'all for whatyou're doing. and i hope that more of that will happen and that silicon valley continuesto become more diverse. and i think that's going to be good not just for any one companyor for the industry, but for the united states in making us more globally competitive inthis 21st century. >>eric schmidt: diversity is a clear strength,right, is the common message here. another question from our electronic audience.homelessness in our cities is reaching epidemic levels. in san francisco, streets are linedwith tents and underpasses are filled with them. why isn't homelessness a federal issue?these are citizens of the united states. the

federal government, and not cities, shouldtake full responsibility for their welfare. >>sect. julian castro: actually, the -- homelessnessvery much is a federal issue. so in 2010, the president laid out a blueprint for endinghomelessness in the united states called opening doors. and it was significant because it wasthe first presidential plan that didn't just say, we want to reduce homelessness. it saidwe want to end homelessness. and the first part of that was ending veteran homelessness.so since 2010, veteran homelessness has gone down by 36%. overall, homelessness has beenreduced by 11%, and with about a 17% reduction in family homelessness. we've also seen areduction in chronic homelessness. so hud delivers billions of dollars of resourcesinto what are called continuums of care that

are locally based partnerships of nonprofitsand governmental entities that deal with homelessness and try and drive down those numbers. however,even though we have seen that progress, it is very clear that especially in these westcoast communities -- seattle, portland, san francisco, los angeles -- that you have seena spike in the last 18 months, two years, especially in unsheltered homeless.>>eric schmidt: right. >>sect. julian castro: people living on thestreets. so about five weeks ago, i joined the mayorsof seattle, portland, san francisco, and l.a. in portland to talk about how we can be helpful.we want to be proactive at hud and help them as they address trying to get the growth inhomelessness under control because we very

much recognize that. but we do have a roleto play. we are playing that role, and not just with money, but also helping them strategizeand getting a good system in place to drive down those numbers.>>eric schmidt: right. go ahead, yes, sir.>>> so -- thank you so much for being here and for the work you're doing. my questionspeaks almost exactly to the previous question. but there was a lot of news coverage recentlyabout utah's homelessness -- program to address homelessness. i think it was even coveredon "the daily show." and they described it as basically their strategy is to providehomes to the homeless. and they have seen a lot of success. they say there are fewerthan 300 homeless people in the state of utah

at this point. i haven't heard a lot of comparisonsbeing drawn from the utah program to federal programs. and i guess i was just wonderingif you could talk about any lessons that you think could be learned from that specificprogram and maybe why those lessons haven't been applied nationally.>>sect. julian castro: yes. so what you're mentioning is something called housing first.so if you all think about public policy a lot of times, and especially as it leans sortof center right, the idea that we have is that, okay, you show that you can take responsibility,and then we're going to give you opportunity. housing first flipped that on its head. itused to be that we would have homeless folks, you know, stay a certain number of nightsin a shelter, start going to an addiction

counselor if they have an addiction or starttrying to look for a job if they're -- obviously, if they're homeless, they're probably outof a job. it flipped that on its head and said, no,you know what? first we're going to put you in permanent housing with supports. so somebodythat will help you try and find a job, help you address an addiction or other issue. butwe're going to give you the opportunity first and then stabilize you so that you can takethat responsibility. and there's a real lesson in that that we're trying to figure out, okay,where else does that apply? and the cities that have been most successfulin driving down their homelessness numbers have been those cities that have been strongestwith housing first.

>>eric schmidt: as a follow-up, do you -- iimagine these are people where life just doesn't work. so they have an addiction problem, theyhave a health problem, a woman with children without a provider husband, and/or bad domesticsituation. do you think that housing first is a necessaryprecondition to solving those problems? because often, my understanding of these people isthat they have compound problems, right? no credit, criminal history, drug problem, youknow, whatever. >>sect. julian castro: yeah. i would say thatthat's shown itself to be the most effective. because having housing stabilizes the individualor the family so that they can then go address those other issues, versus, you know, they'rehaving to sleep in a shelter or transitional

living facility, and kind of address it -- addresstheir issues during the day and worrying about where they're going to sleep at night, it'snot as effective that way. that's what the research has shown.salt lake city and utah in general have been excellent in that regard. and so have a numberof other communities and states. in fact, on veterans day, i was at the war memorialin virginia, in richmond, with terry mcauliffe, celebrating that virginia had become the firststate -- they call themselves a commonwealth, i guess -- to effectively end veteran homelessness.>>> can you just follow up real fast and say, then, how is the federal government pushing,given that we've seen that that's more successful, to apply that everywhere?>>sect. julian castro: yeah. so, i mean, that

is what we're recommending for communitiesall the time to do. and with our continuum of care funding, we have favored that approach,basically. essentially, incentivized continuums of care around the nation to go with the housingfirst model. so we expect that in the years to come, as they get stronger at implementingthat, that we're going to see similar success. let me just very quickly go back to the questionof san francisco and l.a. and some of these communities that have high growth in unshelteredpopulations. you know, there's still a need for transitionalliving and shelters, and especially in communities that have an onslaught of folks living onthe streets. the fact is, you're not going to find all of them permanent housing rightaway. so you need an effective way to deal

with that.one effective way, an example of that, is something called a navigation center in sanfrancisco that i visited a couple of months ago. it is transitional living, but they dothings a little bit differently than most places. for instance, they let people go inas couples into the shelter. and they let folks take their pets. and maybe most importantly,they still have an eye to getting folks to more permanent housing, but they recognizethat's not going to happen right away. >>eric schmidt: ma'am, you'll have the honorof the last question. >>> great. thank you so much.as you know, we are facing a crisis of extreme proportions around affordable housing herein the bay area, and as is the case all across

the country. and yet this is an issue thathas not risen to an issue of national debate. how do we get this issue that is part of anational debate, how do we get this issue to be translated from one that people seeas an individual issue, an individual responsibility, to one that is fundamental to our communities.our infrastructure, how we get to work, how we go home at night and do our homework, howwe stay healthy, all aspects of our life are related to this issue of having a great home.and yet this is not an issue that has adequate resources. and we are facing a very extremesituation here. i'm part of organizations that are doing affordablehousing advocacy in the bay area. we're facing an uphill battle. and yet the solutions areclear. we need more resources flowing.

can you speak to some of those issues? andthank you so very much. >>sect. julian castro: well, thank you forthe work that you and the organization are doing.if we were to go and look at the transcripts of the 2016 debates so far, i don't thinkwe'd find a single mention about housing. i don't even think we'd find a mention abouteducation so far. and so there is a -- there's a disjuncture between what's being focusedon and what -- and the issues that intimately impact the health, the well-being, and theforward trajectory of families. and to your question of, okay, how do we getthis on the radar screen, i wish i had a better answer than just to say that with regard tohousing specifically, people hear "affordable

housing," and they think, "oh, that's poorpeople." but the fact is that more and more middle-class families these days are dealingwith the issue of paying more than a third of their income in rent. and so that issueis affecting so many more people on the spectrum, and folks that vote. so, like anything, itdepends on the activism of everyday americans to put that on the radar screen of peoplerunning for city council and mayor, where a lot of the action on these things happen,to state legislators, and, of course, federal candidates.>>eric schmidt: i think you all see why i wanted secretary castro to come.i just -- i have not met very many political leaders today who have the kind of futurescale that you will have and the impact that

you're going to have on america. i'm veryproud to be american, and i'm very proud that you're going to be one of our great futureand, of course, current leaders. thank you so much for being here.>>sect. julian castro: thank you. appreciate it.[ applause ]